Christian Journalists demand more visibility for women

Christian Journalists demand more visibility for women
Dayo Emmanuel

Christian journalists under the aegis of Journalists For Christ (JFC) Nigeria, have made a demand on media managers in the country on providing adequate reportage of women and issues about them.
The media group, which recently published the report of its one-month-long media monitoring of six newspapers in Nigeria also held two media workshops for journalists in Lagos.
The publication, ‘Mainstreaming Gender Reporting on Affirmative Action of Women and Girls Right Issues,’ was published by JFC with support from the World Association for Christian Communication (WACC).
As part of raising support for gender balance with the media, JFC has also commenced a media visit of the six media houses it had monitored to generate the report. The media organisations include; The Punch newspaper, The Guardian, The Vanguard, The Nation, Daily Trust, and The Sun newspaper.
Speaking at the visit to Daily Trust newspaper, Coordinator of the project, Gbenga Osinaaike, said, “The project is an eye opener to the assumption that women have not enjoyed enough representation in the media.”
Osinaike, a former Assistant Editor at The Punch newspaper and Publisher, Church Times Nigeria, however enjoined Daily Trust newspaper to continue to advance the course of women and girls with its brand.
Also on the team of JFC to Daily Trust was Assistant Director, News, at the Voice of Nigeria, Mrs. Ugonma Cokey, who enjoined media managers to always give more space to women issues.
“More spaces should be created and given to women issues. Women have achieved a lot in other areas apart from fashion and children desks in the newsroom and should be given opportunities according to their competence.”
“We are here at Daily Trust because it was one of the papers we monitored to generate the report. We are however advocating, if possible, we could have women desk because we hardly find men reporting women issues,” she said.
Responding, General Manager, Southern Operations, Daily Trust, Kamaldeen Ademola Oladosu, appreciated JFC and the noble efforts it had exhibited in bringing about the project.
“There are two things that are making me show interest in this project. Number one, we have a pull-out we publish every Sunday called Tambari, which is a woman oriented paper,” he said.
Oladosu continued that, “Our moral standard at Daily Trust is high. Tambarihas its own editor, a female, Amina Alhassan and we have fashion, health and other beats in the pull out, and there is always room for improvement.
He also revealed his organisation’s plan to celebrate women during the International Women’s Day coming up in March.
“As part of our support and recognition for women, we are preparing to celebrate them in March at the International Women’s Day in Abuja. It is going to be a big event. Wife of the President and some governors’ wives are attending the event holding at the Transcorp Hilton in Abuja,” he revealed, stating further that, “Several topics are going to be discussed. The issues you have raised would be addressed as critical issues affecting women. Wife of the South African President Zuma is the Chairperson at the event.”
Oladosu added that, “We also publish an annual magazine called, ‘Women in Power’ magazine, this is a magazine that brings women issues to the fore.”
Talking about women that take to crime, he said, “We have to look at the aspect of women taking into crime. If we want the society to do well, we have to look into this aspect. We have ladies that are doing very well, women need to be challenged to be the best they can be.”

Expressing his concern for women getting involved in crime, Oladosu wants women in the country to condemn such acts in order to minimise the trend.

“The woman that killed her husband in Ibadan had attempted the murder once, until she eventually succeeded. If it was the other way round, some women would have carried placards. If we want a better society, such wicked acts must be addressed.” He said.
Others on the team of JFC at the media visit were the Project Consultant, ‘Sanmi Falobi, Admin Secretary, JFC, Dayo Emmanuel and Damilola Adeoye.

UN HRC: 58 NGOs warn of harmful impact of “countering and preventing violent extremism”



image
ARTICLE 19 has been joined by more than 50 other leading international and national civil society organisations in calling on the UN Human Rights Council to consider serious concerns around certain initiatives around “countering and preventing violent extremism” (PVE). Some of these initiatives risk significantly negative impacts on human rights, particularly the right to freedom of expression.
In advance of the 31st Session of the UN Human Rights Council (HRC), the joint letter to the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein, supplemented with a joint written submission to the HRC, intends to inform all stakeholders’ contributions to an HRC panel discussion on PVE on 17 March 2016.
Through the letter and submission, ARTICLE 19 and others “recognise that PVE initiatives that are based on a clear definition of the phenomenon being addressed, have a proper evidential basis for harm reduction, and that respect human rights and civil society space, can play a potentially positive role.” However, the experience of many organisations is that, as with “counter-terrorism” measures, not all PVE initiatives meet these standards.
The letter and submission argue that the lack of an agreed definition for “violent extremism” opens the door to human rights and others abuses, compounded by the danger of conflating the phenomenon itself with “terrorism” and thereby leading to the overbroad application of “counter-terrorism” measures.
While packaged as positive measures, the letter and submission state that “many PVE initiatives have a significant potential to threaten the human rights to equality and freedom from discrimination, the right to privacy, and the freedoms of expression, association, and religion or belief.”
Governments routinely label their political opponents, journalists and human rights defenders as “violent extremists” simply for exercising their rights: PVE initiatives may provide some governments with further grounds to stifle freedom of expression, and crush dissent.
The letter and written submission also question the evidential basis for many PVE initiatives, which tend to alienate the very communities they seek to help, and are perceived as stigmatising and discriminatory and as a form of “soft surveillance.” While PVE initiatives are often framed not as addressing a particular religion or ideology, ARTICLE 19 and others note how they overwhelmingly target Muslims, with some programmes specifically targeting and stigmatising Muslim women.
There are also serious concerns that certain PVE initiatives target individuals’ access to the Internet or specific online platforms, to block lawful online content, and create blanket restrictions on access to specific platforms or encryption services. Increasingly, governments are enlisting private companies in these efforts on a “voluntarily” basis, circumventing procedural safeguards for the rights of users. At the same time, States too often overlook the enormous potential of a free and open Internet to enable robust debate in making a contribution to PVE.
HRC resolution 30/15 on “human rights and countering and preventing violent extremism”, adopted by vote after substantial oral revisions, called for the panel discussion on this issue. The resolution is criticised in the letter and submission for failing to “properly capture the danger for abuse of PVE initiatives”, and for “providing inadequate language aimed to protect human rights”.
In December 2015, the UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon launched the UN “Plan of Action to Prevent Violent Extremism”. Though this all-encompassing agenda acknowledges several of the concerns that civil society have highlighted to the UN Human Rights Council, it largely fails to resolve them. There are concerns that it will lead to a proliferation of PVE initiatives that do not contain sufficient safeguards to protect human rights.
ARTICLE 19 calls on the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and all States to carefully consider the concerns raised in the joint letter and submission at the PVE panel discussion at the 31st Session of the HRC.

SIGNATORIES

The Joint Letter and Written Submission are endorsed by:
ARTICLE 19
American Civil Liberties Union
Amnesty International
Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development
Association for Progressive Communications
Human Rights Watch
International Commission of Jurists
International Federation for Human Rights - FIDH
International Humanist and Ethical Union
International Press Institute
International Service for Human Rights
PEN International
Privacy International
World Association of Newspapers - WAN-IFRA
Access Now
ActiveWatch Romania
Afghanistan Journalists Center
Australian Privacy Foundation
Bahrain Centre for Human Rights
Brazilian Association of Investigative Journalism - ABRAJI
Cambodia Center for Independent Media - CCIM
Canadian Journalists for Free Expression
International Cartoonist Rights Network
Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility - CMFR
Charity & Security Network
Committee to Protect Journalists - CPJ
Council on American-Islamic Relations - CAIR
English PEN
European Digital Rights - EDRi
Federation of Nepali Journalists - FNJ
Free Media Movement (Sri Lanka)
Freedom Forum
Fundamendios
Globe International Center (Mongolia)
Gulf Centre for Human Rights
Human Rights Network for Journalists (Uganda)
Independent Journalism Center -IJC (Moldova)
Index on Censorship
International Federation of Journalists - IFJ (Asia-Pacific)
La Quadrature du Net
March Lebanon
Media Foundation for West Africa
Media Institute of Southern Africa
Media Rights Agenda
Media Watch Media
Entertainment & Arts Alliance (Australia)
Mizzima News
Muslims for Progressive Values
National Union of Somali Journalism - NUSOJ
Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms- MADA
PEN America
PEN Canada
Social Media Exchange - SMEX (Beirut)
South East European Network for Professionalization of Media
Southeast Asian Press Alliance - SEAPA
Vigilance for Democracy and the Civic State
West African Human Rights Defenders' Network - WAHRDN
World Association of Community Radio Broadcasters- AMARC

Group Presents FoI, Whistle Blowers Bill to Lagos Assembly

 

February 16, 2016

By Femi Durojaiye

A non-governmental organisation, the United Action for Change (UAC),
yesterday presented two bills to the Lagos State House of Assembly, the
bills are the Freedom of Information (FoI) and Whistle Blower bills.

The two bills were presented to the Speaker by the Legal Adviser to UAC,
Adewale Ademola, who said that the organisation felt that the bills would
help fight corruption in the system.

According to the secretary of the organisation, Mr. Michael Popoola, the two
bills already exist as an act of the National Assembly and when the FoI Act
was passed into law by the National Assembly, there was much rejoicing, not
only by the press, but a majority of Nigerians.

Popoola said: "The need for transparency and accountability is even greater
now than ever as the thrust of government both at the federal and state
levels are in tune with the change agenda of the ruling party.

"The effects of these bills, which will eventually trickle down to the local
government level on the need to fight corruption to a standstill and
eventually eliminating it from our body polity," he said.

He observed that there were some snags in the FoI Law and that though there
is a federal legislation on it, the federal legislation does not apply in
the states and that except the laws are domesticated.

The FoI bill and Whistle Blowers Bill, he said can only apply in those
states, where they have been domesticated.

"The bills proposed for Lagos State have taken care of the defects noticed
in the federal law. In this respect, it will be noticed that the federal FoI
Act has 32 sections inclusive of the interpretation and citation sections.

"The proposed Lagos version has 33 sections inclusive of the interpretation
and citation sections. The new sections in the proposed Lagos Bill are
sections 20 and 21. The old section 20 of the FoI Act provides for judicial
review," he said.

The rights activist stated further that the new Lagos Bill section 20
provides for Complainant Commissioner, the new Lagos Bill section 21
provides for Appeal Commissioners.

He stressed that the essence of creating the Office of the Complainant
Commissioner, who is the Ombudsman in addition to the Office of Complaint
Commissioners under section 21 of the proposed Lagos laws is to resolve
disputes relating to rejected request for information.

"With particular reference to the FoI Bill, the proposed Lagos State version
has sought to introduce these sections, which will aid the effective
functioning of the law by creating the Office of the Complaint Commissioner,
some kind of Ombudsman and also the office of complaint tribunal to resolve
disputes relating to rejected request for information," he stated.

In his response, the Speaker of the assembly, Hon. Mudashiru Obasa,
commended the UAC for the presentation, adding that it was a reminder of
what is expected of lawmakers.

Obasa promised that the Assembly would not fail the NGO and that the
proposed bills would be given thorough attention, but that the assembly had
not abandoned the FoI Bill the seventh assembly worked on.

"The bills would be given the necessary approvals. We should all be agents
of change. We must support the government of the day and do what is right.
We should depart from bad ways of doings things.

"Our government has started the process of departing from our old ways of
doing things. We will continue to work on that. We as professionals must all
be concerned about fighting corruption. We will do whatever wo do with
transparency and probity," he said.