Nigerian police detain publisher
|
Abuja, Nigeria, March 10, 2016 - Nigerian authorities should immediately release magazine publisher Yomi Olomofe on bail, the Committee to Protect Journalists said today. Police detained Olomofe early this evening in Lagos, after men he had accused of severely beating him in June 2015 alleged the publisher had assaulted and attempted to extort money from them, Olomofe and his lawyer told CPJ by telephone.
On June 25, 2015, Olomofe, who publishes the monthly community magazine Prime Magazine, and McDominic Nkpemenyie, a correspondent with the state-funded Tide Newspaper, were investigatingallegations that customs officers at Seme, on Nigeria's border with Benin, were complicit in smuggling, when more than 15 men attacked the two journalists, Olomofe told CPJ. The men hit Olomofe on his face and body with their fists and sticks until he lost consciousness, the publisher and witnesses told CPJ days later, after Olomofe regained consciousness.
In a June 30, 2015, complaint to the Lagos state police commissioner, and a July 1, 2015, complaint to the inspector general of police, Olomofe identified his attackers and customs officers who had not intervened to stop the attack. Police have not charged anyone for assaulting the journalists, Olomofe and his lawyer, Akin Osunsusi, told CPJ.
In an October 2015 complaint to the police, the men Olomofe had accused of beating him themselves alleged that he had assaulted them and had attempted to extort money from them, the publisher told CPJ. He denied the accusations, and he and his lawyer said the first they had heard of them was today, after his arrest. It was unclear whether the publisher was formally charged with a crime.
"Arresting magazine publisher Yomi Olomofe for beating the men he says beat him to a pulp is nothing short of obscene," Peter Nkanga, CPJ's West Africa representative, said. "Rather than blaming the messenger, police should energetically pursue those responsible for the crime."
A police officer at the Lagos State Criminal Investigation Department (SCID), who gave his name only as Aminu, contacted by CPJ on March 8 in the course of follow-up research into the initial incident, said that he had repeatedly invited the customs officers for questioning about the June 2015 beating, but that they had not come, despite his having copied the head office of the customs service in Abuja. "Being service officers," he said, "I cannot just arrest them."
One of the customs officers who Olomofe said had not intervened to stop the 2015 attack told CPJ at the time that there was nothing he could do: The assailants were too "rowdy."
Police at the SCID today told CPJ that they had been instructed to pass Olomofe's file to the Force Criminal Investigation Department (FCID) in Alagbon, in Lagos state, where Olomofe is held. Dolapo Badmus, the Lagos State police spokeswoman told CPJ that police authorities in Abuja have jurisdiction over FCID and not the Lagos State Police Command. CPJ could not immediately reach the FCID spokesman for comment.
Deji Elumoye, the chairman of the Lagos state chapter of the Nigeria Union of Journalists, told CPJ that police in Alagbon had refused to grant Olomofe bail today, and that representatives of the union had not been allowed to see him in custody.
Olomofe and the Lagos state chapter of the Nigeria Union of Journalists in January 2016 filed a civil lawsuit against the attackers and the customs service seeking compensation for the attack, according to press reports.
###
CPJ is an independent, nonprofit organization that works to safeguard press freedom worldwide.
Contact:
Kerry Paterson
Africa Research Associate
+1 212-300-9031
Email: kpaterson@cpj.org
Peter Nkanga
West Africa Representative
Email: pnkanga@cpj.org
Court orders Obasanjo, Yar’Adua, Jonathan govts to account for recovered loot
The Federal High Court sitting in Lagos, in a landmark judgment, has held
that successive governments since the return of democracy in 1999 “breached
the fundamental principles of transparency and accountability for failing
to disclose details about the spending of recovered stolen public funds,
including on a dedicated website.”
The court then ordered the government of President Muhammadu Buhari to
“ensure that his government, and the governments of former President
Olusegun Obasanjo, former President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua, and former
President Goodluck Jonathan account fully for all recovered loot.”
The judgment was delivered on Friday by Justice M.B. Idris following a
Freedom of Information suit no:FHC/IKJ/CS/248/2011 brought by the
Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP).
The details ordered by the court to be disclosed include information on the
total amount of recovered stolen public assets by each government, the
amount of recovered stolen public assets spent by each government as well
as the objects of such spending and the projects on which such funds were
spent.
Justice Idris dismissed all the objections raised by the Federal Government
and upheld SERAP’s arguments. Consequently, the court entered judgment in
favour of SERAP against the Federal Government as follows:
1. *A DECLARATION *is hereby made that the failure and/or refusal of the
respondents to individually and/or collectively disclose detailed
information about the spending of recovered stolen public funds since the
return of civil rule in 1999, and to publish widely such information,
including on a dedicated website, amounts to a breach of the fundamental
principles of transparency and accountability and violates Articles 9, 21
and 22 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Ratification
and Enforcement) Act
2. *A DECLARATION *is hereby made that by virtue of the provisions of
Section 4 (a) of the Freedom of Information Act 2011, the 1st
Defendant/Respondent is under a binding legal obligation to provide the
Plaintiff/Applicant with up to date information on the spending of
recovered stolen funds, including:
(a) Detailed information on the total amount of recovered stolen public
assets that have so far been recovered by Nigeria
(b) The amount that has been spent from the recovered stolen public assets
and the objects of such spending
(c) Details of projects on which recovered stolen public assets were spent
3. *AN ORDER OF MANDAMUS* is made directing and or compelling the
Defendants/Respondents to provide the Plaintiff/Applicant with up to date
information on recovered stolen funds since the return of civilian rule in
1999, including:
(a) Detailed information on the total amount of recovered stolen public
assets that have so far been recovered by Nigeria
(b) The amount that has been spent from the recovered stolen public assets
and the objects of such spending
(c) Details of projects on which recovered stolen public assets were spent
SERAP deputy executive director, Olukayode Majekodunmi, said, “This
judgment confirms the persistent failure of successive governments,
starting from the Obasanjo government, to respect Nigerians’ right to a
corruption-free society and to uphold constitutional and international
commitments on transparency and accountability.
“The judgment is an important step towards reversing a culture of secrecy
and corruption that has meant that high-ranking government officials
continue to look after themselves at the expense of the well-being of
majority of Nigerians, and development of the country.
“This is a crucial precedent that vindicates the right to a transparent and
accountable government and affirms the human right of the Nigerian people
to live a life free from want and fear. We are in the process of obtaining
a certified copy of the around 60 pages judgment. SERAP will do everything
within its power to secure the full and effective enforcement of this
judgment.
The Federal Government had through its counsel, Sheba Olugbenga, filed a
Notice of Preliminary Objection dated March 26, 2012 on the grounds that
SERAP lacked the locus standi to institute the action, that the action was
statute barred, and that SERAP’s affidavit evidence offended the provisions
of the Evidence Act.
On May 8, 2012 the Federal Government filed additional written address in
support of its preliminary objection, arguing against the retroactive
nature of SERAP’s request; saying since the Freedom of Information Act was
enacted in 2011, citizens cannot be demanding disclosure of government
spending since 1999.
In response, SERAP argued that the FOI Act was a special specie of
legislation to liberalize and expand access to information for all
Nigerians; that the FOI Act does not impose any requirement of locus standi
on applicants; that the only relevant limitation period in the case is that
which requires filing of suit within 30 days if information is not given;
that the right which the FOI Act seeks to protect is the right of the
public to have access to information which is in custody of a public
official or institution; and that the information sought by SERAP was not
caught by the law against retroactivity, noting that the right in question
is expropriatory in nature which justifies the granting of access to the
requested information on the ground of overriding public interest.
SERAP also argued in its pleadings that “By virtue of Section 1 (1) of the
FOI Act 2011, it is entitled as of right to request for or gain access to
information which is in the custody or possession of any public official,
agency or institution. By the provisions of Section 2(7) and 31 of the FOI
Act 2011, the Accountant General of the Federation is a public official. By
virtue of Section 4 (a) of the FOI Act when a person makes a request for
information from a public official, institution or agency, the public
official, institution or agency to whom the application is directed is
under a binding legal obligation to provide the applicant with the
information requested for, except as otherwise provided by the Act, within
7 days after the application is received.”
The organization also argued that, “The information requested relates to
the spending on recovered stolen funds since the return of civilian rule in
1999. By Sections 2(3)(d)(V) & (4) of the FOI Act, a public official is
under a binding legal duty to ensure that documents containing information
relating to the receipt or expenditure of recovered stolen funds are widely
disseminated and made readily available to members of the public through
various means.”
According to the organization, “The information requested does not come
within the purview of the types of information exempted from disclosure by
the provisions of the FOI Act. The government has no reason whatsoever to
deny SERAP access to the information sought. The requested information,
apart from not being exempted from disclosure under the FOI Act, bothers on
an issue of national interest, public concern, social justice, good
governance, transparency and accountability.”
“The power or discretion to refuse to give access to information requested
for cannot be exercised in vacuo. Such a power or discretion must be
provided for by the FOI Act itself. This means, therefore, that a request
for information can only be denied or turned down if the information
requested is one which is exempted from disclosure under the provisions of
the FOI Act. In the case at hand, the information requested for by the
plaintiff relates strictly to the spending of recovered stolen funds since
the return of civilian rule in 1999.”
“Obedience to the rule of law by all citizens but more particularly those
who publicly took oath of office to protect and preserve the constitution
is a desideratum to good governance and respect for the rule of law. In a
democratic society, this is meant to be a norm; it is an apostasy for
government to ignore the provisions of the law and the necessary rules made
to regulate matters.”
Property rights reporting Grant for Journalists
The Pulitzer centre on crisis reporting
is providing grant to support the reporting of property rights issues in
Nigeria.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
Journalists and others with a project to ensure that artificial intelligence is used ethically and in the public interest can compete in th... -
Journalists interested in covering immunization issues can apply to attend this training. The World Federation of Science Journalists (WFS... -
The International Center for Journalists (ICFJ), in partnership with the Children’s Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF), is recruiting for Ea...
-
Professional and amateur photographers living in Latin America can enter this contest. Escuela Nacional Sindical – Colombia organizes th... -
Deadline: MAY 15, 2017 Journalists in developing or transitioning countries can apply for a fellowship to travel to the 10th Global I...
-
African filmmakers can present their films for screening. The Rwanda Film Festival (RFF), also known as “Hillywood,” organized by the Rw... -
Deadline : 12 October 2017 Applications are open for the fourth round of its Digital News Initiative (DNI) Innovation Fund in order to su...
-
Journalists can submit stories in Portuguese and English to this award. The Brazilian Association of Automotive Engineering organizes the ... -
Journalists worldwide working for news organizations in a business, technology or leadership capacity can apply for a fellowship at Harvard...
-
Journalists with at least four years of experience can apply for this position in Abu Dhabi, UAE. Sky News Arabia is hiring a digital mu...